Minister for Racing, Employment and Industrial Relations and Multicultural Affairs
GPO Box 611
Brisbane Q 4001
Dear Ms Grace,
Thank you for your letter of 16 March 2016 regarding my concern over the use of the whip in horse racing events.
Members of our family have been involved in the horse racing industry. We know that jockeys are instructed that they can only whip the horse a certain number of times PRIOR to the 100m mark. After that stage, an all out beating is permitted and those beatings are encouraged and in fact ordered to occur. Jockeys are told that they will be fined if they do not whip the horse all the way to the post. They will face 'discipline' if they are an apprentice and that means fines. Trainers have made it very clear to the jockeys that they are to use the whip as often as they need to, in order to get that horse past the post first. Trainers instruct the jockeys that they need not worry about the fine as that will be deducted from the winnings. This is routine and regular practice. See the link below for an example from 2 April, 2016.
I understand you have been made aware of the study undertaken by the RSPCA on the effect of whipping a racehorse. If you have not been made aware of this study, please check this link: http://www.rspca.org.au/campaigns/whips-racing/study-whip-use-jockeys
I have pasted some important details from the study below.
If you have ever struck your body with a padded horse whip, you will see that it is not effective in preventing pain. It hurts! But the study shows that the whip does not encourage a horse to move any faster.
If a person habitually beat a dog or cat or any other animal for no defensive reason at all, ie to prevent being bitten or scratched, such a person would be committing an offense and could face prosecution. Why is it that horses are 'allowed' to be regularly beaten? For the same reason that bulls are allowed to be tortured in bull-fights! Human entertainment and financial gain.
The Australian Arabian Racing Association does not permit the use of the whip, except in a situation that might be life threatening.
Please use your influence to completely prevent this abuse continuing to be 'legal' in the Thoroughbred Horse Racing Industry.
This study analyses race footage and highlights the unacceptable use of the whip in Thoroughbred racing as well as the inability of stewards to police the rules.
Published in 2012 and conducted by veterinarian and Professor Paul McGreevy at the University of Sydney, the study reignites calls for the racing industry to review the use of whips in racing.
This study also builds on a previous study released in 2011 which found that whipping a horse does not increase the chance of a horse finishing first, second or third and that 98% of horses were being whipped without it influencing the race outcome.
Findings of the Study
The study assessed the area struck and the visual impact of whip use on horses and included a total of 350 rider-horse interactions, of which 109 were clear, behind the saddle impacts. Two observers, working independently, found the following:
- The whip caused a visual indentation on the horse in 83% of impacts
- The unpadded section of the whip made contact on 64% of impacts
- At least 28 examples of apparent breaches of whip rules were found
- More than 75% of the time the whip struck the horse in the abdomen (or flank)
- The majority of jockeys observed used a backhand whip action, possibly to avoid being penalised as, at the time of the study, the Australian whip rules maintained a focus solely on forehand action.
- The rules in place governing whip use in Thoroughbred racing are not being adhered to.
- So-called padding of a whip is not effective in safeguarding horses from possible pain.
- This study shows the ARB cannot adequately police the rules that are in place and the next step is to end the use of whips as performance aids all together.
What do the results of this study mean for the ongoing use of the whip in racing?
The outcome of this study shows that the improper use of whips is commonplace and that it is impossible for stewards, using the technology currently available to them, to effectively police the rules surrounding whip use in Thoroughbred racing. Only through high quality, high speed vision is it possible to see exactly what is happening and unfortunately stewards don’t currently have access to this footage.
What is the issue with backhand whip use?
This study reveals that backhand whip use is far more common than anticipated by Australian whip rules. It is possible that jockeys have been encouraged to use backhand rather than a forehand action to avoid penalisation. There is no evidence that backhand whippings are less painful. It is important to note that there are no restrictions in whip use with either forehand or backhand actions in the final 100m of races.
What is the issue with striking the abdomen with a whip?
Striking the horse in the abdomen, also referred to as the flank, is likely to be more painful to the horse than a strike on the hindquarters because there is little muscle in this area to absorb the impact of the whip. The flank also extends to the stifle joint and is extremely sensitive and vulnerable to injury. For this reason, strikes to the flank are prohibited under international racing rules.
Australia is signatory to the International Agreement on Breeding and Racing which lists specific prohibitions for whip use, including using the whip on the flank. The results of the current study indicate that Australian racing authorities are not meeting their obligations under this International Agreement.
The British Horseracing Authority does not allow whips to hit the abdomen, which means that less than 25% of whip strikes observed in this study would have been acceptable in the UK.
Surely jockeys wouldn’t be using whips if they don’t make horses run faster?
Perception is a powerful thing on the part of jockeys who may feel a change in the horse’s stride when it’s whipped and on the part of owners and punters who correlate whipping with getting the most out of a horse. There is no agreed line within the industry as to why whips are used at all – it’s cultural.
What is a padded whip?
So-called padded whips have a shock-absorbent layer between the inner spine and outer sleeve. This is intended to provide a cushioning layer between the horse’s body and the hard inner spine of the whip. The padding does not extend along the full shaft of the whip – only for about one-third of the whip’s length. The claim is that such a whip “will cause less pain and less damage to the body being struck” compared to a conventional whip, however there is no evidence to support this argument.
Padded whips don’t cause pain, so what’s the problem with using them?
So-called padded whips do cause pain – they may be less painful than traditional contact whips when applied in exactly the same manner. But jockeys wouldn’t use them if they didn’t inflict some pain on the horse. In fact, this study found that in 64% of impacts, the unpadded part of the whip came in contact with the horse. It may be that jockeys are using the so-called padded whip in a different way to overcome the possibility that it has less impact on the horse.
What does a horse feel when it is struck with a whip?
There is no evidence to suggest that whipping does not hurt. Whips can cause bruising and inflammation, however, horses do have resilient skin. That is not to say that their skin is insensitive. Indeed, a horse can easily feel a fly landing on its skin. Repeated striking with a whip (of any type) in the same area of the body has the potential to cause localised trauma and tissue damage, the extent of which will increase with the force of the strike and the number of repetitions.
Whips are essential for jockey safety, or to make the horse ‘pay attention’, aren’t they?
Jockeys aren’t whipping their horses in the last 100m of a race to increase safety or to remind their horse to pay attention. If jockeys didn’t need to use the whip before that point for safety reasons then why suddenly pull it out at the end?
Bringing safety into the argument is just an attempt to distract people from the real problem – that last 100m where whips can be used indiscriminately.
What are the ARB whip rules?
At the time of this study there were no restrictions on backhand whip strikes at any stage of a race. Following changes made on 1 December 2015, the ARB whip rules now state that jockeys can use the whip in either a forehand or backhand manner only five times before the final 100m of a race, however these are not to be used in consecutive strides. During the last 100m of a race, whips can be used at a jockey’s discretion, which essentially means horses can be whipped most when they are at their most fatigued and least able to respond.
What does RSPCA want next?
The RSPCA wants reform of the whip rules and an end of the use of the whip as a performance aid altogether. The study also confirms that there is unacceptable use of the whip in Thoroughbred racing and that stewards are not properly resourced to police Australian whip rules.
FB Horse Sense Australia
Horse Sense Australia
Ph +61 466 661 412
ABN: 50 274 771 727